Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

391 So. 2d 694

Rawls v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1980

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-11-19

Relies on Naya v. Naya · Lee v. State

Decided 1980-11-19

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal1 from a summary denial of a Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, motion for post-conviction relief. Contrary to the requirements of Rule 3.850,2 the motion did not state whether there was an appeal from the judgment or sentence and the disposition thereof, nor did the motion state whether a previous post-conviction motion had been filed and, if so, how many, nor was the motion under oath. The order appealed is affirmed without prejudice to defendant’s filing a sufficient motion providing the required information under oath raising the same substantive issues. Saxon v. State, 384 So.2d 35 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Monroe v. State, 371 So.2d 683 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).

¶2AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

¶3. Rule 9.140(g), Fla.R.App.P.

¶4. The rules provide a complete fill-in-the-blanks form to assist prisoners in preparing 3.850 motions.

/391/so2d/694 · .json · Public domain