¶1OPINION
¶2Opinion by
¶3Relators contend the trial judge erred in granting a motion for new trial. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.