Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland))
Relationships
Relies on Bearden v. Georgia · Tate v. Short · Boykin v. State · Cardona v. State · Moore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether to revoke community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision, the court or parole panel shall consider: (1) the defendant’s employment status; (2) the defendant’s earning ability; (3) the defendant’s financial resources; (4) the willfulness of the defendant’s failure to pay; and (5) any other special circumstances that may affect the defendant’s ability to pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lombardo v. State“strict evidentiary requirements for revocations premised on nonpayment of court costs, attorney compensation, and community-supervision fees” and observing that the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may be understood by reasonably well-informed persons in two or more different senses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lang, Terri Regina
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.