Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 F.2d 1 - No 24099

No 24099’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1985

1 district · 1 state decisions

40196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · Local 174 Teamsters Chaukfeurs Warehousemen Helpers of America v. Lucas Flour Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The function of the Court is very limited when the parties have agreed to submit all questions of contract interpretation to the arbitrator. It is confined to ascertaining whether the party seeking arbitration is making a claim which on its face is governed by the contract. * * * The courts, therefore, have no business weighing the merits of the grievance, considering whether there is equity in a particular claim, or determining whether there is particular language in the written instrument which will support the claim. The agreement is to submit all grievances to arbitration, not merely those which the court will deem meritorious.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is the arbitrator’s construction which was bargained for; and so far as the arbitrator’s decision concerns construction of a contract, the Courts have no business overruling him because their interpretation of the contract is different from his.” Teamsters Local Unions, 745, etc. v. Braswell Motor Freight Lines, 392 F.2d 1, 7 (5 Cir.1968).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.