Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 F.2d 210 - Williams v. Coiner

Williams v. Coiner’s Empirical Analysis

392 F.2d 210 · 1968

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
October 1991
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1991 · most notably Loper v. Beto (1972), United States v. Thoresen (1970)

35 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions

4201968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Burgett v. Texas · James Graham v. State of West Virginia · Greer v. Beto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If upon investigation it is found that Williams desired and sought an appeal, that he was refused by his lawyers because of his indigence and that he was not advised of his right to have the state provide counsel and the requisite transcript, then the District Court should order petitioner’s release unless the state’s appellate courts will grant a delayed appeal. Puckett v. State of North Carolina, 343 F.2d 452 (4th Cir. 1965); Newsom v. Peyton, 341 F.2d 904 (4th Cir. 1965).’’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not a jurisdictional concept but simply a flexible matter of comity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.