Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 F.2d 532 - Barbee v. United States

Barbee v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

392 F.2d 532 · 1968

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of Columbia (1983), United States v. Grissom (1981)

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

140196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 331 · 18 U.S.C. § 471 (Counterfeit Deterrence Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 472 · 18 U.S.C. § 473

Relies on City of Greenwood v. Peacock · Fourco Glass Company v. Transmirra Products Corporation · Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Strachan Shipping Co. · Commissioner v. Brown · Malat v. Riddell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “should be applied when the physical integrity of the currency is challenged in any way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.