Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 F.2d 949 - Esse Forrester O'brien, Joined by Her Husband, John L. O'brien, and William F. O'Brien v. United States

Esse Forrester O'brien, Joined by Her Husband, John L. O'brien, and William F. O'Brien v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

392 F.2d 949 · 1968

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
October 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2015

5 federal appellate ·

90196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berman v. Parker · Shoemaker v. United States · United States v. Merz · Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co. · United States v. Tampa Bay Garden Apartments, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Non-Jury Actions. In an action to be tried without a jury the court shall accept the master’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous. Within 10 days after being served with notice of the filing of the report any party may serve written objections thereto upon the other parties. Application to the court for action upon the report and upon objections thereto shall be by motion and upon notice as prescribed in Rule 6(d). The court after hearing may adopt the report or may modify it or may reject it in whole or in part or may receive further evidence or may recommit it with instructions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.