In Re: Vickie Lynn Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2023
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 304
Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Durfee v. Duke · Markham v. Allen · Underwriters National Assurance Company v. North Carolina Life and Accident and Health Insurance Guaranty Association · Sutton v. English
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“entertain suits in favor of creditors, legatees and heirs and other claimants against a decadent’s estate to establish their claims so long as the federal court does not interfere with the probate proceedings or assume general jurisdiction of the probate or control of the property in custody of the state court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]ny cause of action appertaining to estates or incident to an estate shall be brought in a statutory probate court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.