Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 F.3d 397 - Saiz v. Barnhart

Saiz v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

392 F.3d 397 · 2004

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
February 2017
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Barnhart · Butler v. Barnhart · Berna v. Chater

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a finding of disabled usually applies when the full range of sedentary work is significantly eroded”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] sedentary RFC already represents a significantly restricted range of work”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.