Jones v. Braxton’s Empirical Analysis
392 F.3d 683 · 2004
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably In re Cline (2008), United States v. Harper (2008)
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Castro v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 2253(c) has no application here because the district court’s decision dismissing the Amended Petition is not “a final order in a habeas corpus proceeding” within the meaning of the statute. Rather, the decision is a final order dismissing the Amended Petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction to review the order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), we are required to construe the notice of appeal that Jones filed as an application for a certificate of appeala-bility.”); see also Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Cartledge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.