Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 FSUPP2D 1082 - Forest Guardians v. Veneman

Forest Guardians v. Veneman’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 2011
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 16 U.S.C. § 1531 (§ 2 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (§ 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1536 (§ 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973)

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Camp v. Pitts · Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council · Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · West Virginia State Department of Tax & Revenue v. Internal Revenue Service

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.