392 F. Supp. 2d 939 - Chesher v. Neyer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Ultimately, the Court concludes that determining whether Plaintiffs’ injuries ■were “serious” is a question best determined on a case-by-case basis. Furthermore, it concludes that although the Plaintiffs’ level of emotional distress must.be “serious,” “seriousness” in the context of a mishandled corpse is something unique. It is something that renders a reasonably constituted person “unable to cope adequately” given the distress, but it need not be “severe and debilitating” in the traditional sense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 878 F. Supp. 2d 869 - Range v. Douglas

2. “[a]s the above quotation from the Court's earlier Order clearly states, the Court relied upon the exceptions found at . . . 2744.03[A] (6)(a & b) to find the . . . individual County Defendants liable for IIED [intentional infliction of emotional distress], NIED [negligent infliction of emotional distress], and Civil Conspiracy.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Chesher v. Neyer

3. “governmental function” will necessarily involve judicial interpretation. Id. See O.R.C. § 2744.01(C)(1) and § 2744.01(G)(1), defining”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hunt v. City of Toledo Law Department