392 N.J. Super. 538 - State v. Burr’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Davis v. Washington · Idaho v. Wright · State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial would have been a more fair and complete adversarial process if, in evaluating the evidence and the inferences urged by the State, jurors were aware that defendant’s mental disability prevents him from viewing the world as others do in terms of acceptable social interactions. [Ibid.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Burr“need for a trustworthiness analysis ... under N.J.R.E. 803(c)(27), and the same factors identified in Wright , and endorsed by D.G., are appropriate for guidance in that context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. PS“severe and sustained impairment in social interaction ... and the development of restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Burr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.