Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 NW2D 224 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Scruggs v. State (1992), Hodgson v. State (1995)

71 state decisions

2501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · Cuyler v. Sullivan · McMann v. Richardson · United States v. Marion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Which witnesses to call at trial and what information to present to the jury are questions that lie within the proper discretion of the trial counsel. Such trial tactics should not be reviewed by an appellate court, which, unlike the counsel, has the benefit of hindsight. Counsel must, after all, have the flexibility to represent a client to the fullest extent possible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “First * * * that counsels’ performance was deficient. This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment. Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsels’ errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.