State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pauling v. McElroy · Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Group of Institutional Investors · State Ex Rel. Schwanke v. Utecht · 195 Cal. App. 2d 596 - Burns v. Municipal Court · Walter S. McCary v. State of Kansas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Jurisdiction of the offense charged and of the person of the accused is a fundamental and indispensable prerequisite to a prosecution. In the absence of jurisdiction over both the offense and,the person there is and can be no prosecution. [Citations.]” State v. Clark, Wyo., 392 P.2d 539, 540 (1964).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marshall v. State · Rios v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.