Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 P3D 699 - BEBOUT v. EWELL

BEBOUT v. EWELL’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · Booth v. McKnight · Gassin v. McJunkin · Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · Norman v. Trison Development Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notice and an opportunity to be heard must be provided in such a way that a person can intelligently decide in advance whether to appear at the hearing and contest the matters in issue or acquiesce in their in absentia resolution and assume the risk from consequences attendant upon a default.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Due process requires notice that is reasonably calculated to inform interested parties of the pending action and of every critical stage so as to afford them an opportunity to defend or to meet the issues at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.