¶1The trial judge erred when she required appellant to make all future mortgage payments on the marital home, yet allowed appellee to retain her full one-half interest *1009in the home without providing appellant a credit against appellee’s half of the proceeds if the jointly owned property is sold. Smith v. Smith, 390 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Rabino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
¶2The judgment appealed as amended by this opinion, is otherwise affirmed.