Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 So. 2d 13 - Kauffmann v. Baker

392 So. 2d 13 - Kauffmann v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 423 So. 2d 452 - Starks v. Starks (1982), 442 So. 2d 310 - Clayton v. Clayton (1983)

27 state decisions

1901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 377 So. 2d 1150 - Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee · Pan American Metal Products Co. v. Healy · 84 So. 2d 717 - Roberts v. Roberts · 382 So. 2d 1317 - Mills v. Heenan · Cronin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The appellant retains the burden of overcoming the presumption of correctness attributed to a trial court's final judgment. Appellant's burden includes a demonstration of error from the record, which he must supply. Litigants who proceed ... without a court reporter take a calculated risk. If the facts are determined adversely they may well be unable to demonstrate error on appeal due to the absence of a record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Under these circumstances, where the record deficiencies are apparent and the record itself reflects appellant’s awareness of them, we find no need to award a second opportunity to supplement the record. To hold otherwise would necessitate our leading the parties by the hand in an attempt to get an adequate record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If the court finds the record is incomplete, it shall direct a party to supply the omitted parts of the record. No proceeding shall be determined, because of an incomplete record, until an opportunity to supplement the record has been given.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.