392 So. 2d 415 - Brown v. STATE, ETC.’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lawton v. Steele · Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co. · State v. Madere · State v. Ricks · Killian v. Craft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The background of [this] provision indicates an understanding that the statutory limitations and police power regulations are to be given a broad ambit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The Declaration of Rights of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“A. All law enforcement officers of municipal police forces, sheriffs departments and the division of state police are hereby authorized and empowered and it is made mandatory and compulsory on their part to confiscate and immediately destroy all gambling devices or machines used for gambling that come to their attention. B. As used in this section the term “gambling device” means: (1) any slot machine ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.