392 So. 2d 49 - Bailey v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A. (1982), 483 So. 2d 455 - Levy v. Levy (1986)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp. · 384 So. 2d 171 - Allen v. Estate of Dutton · 260 So. 2d 492 - Roberts v. Askew · 382 So. 2d 52 - Blum v. Blum · Frumkes v. Frumkes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether the trial court lacks jurisdiction depends not simply on the fact that an appeal in the case has been taken and is pending, but rather on the nature of the action being taken by the trial court in relation to the subject matter of the pending appeal. If what the trial court does while the appeal is pending cannot affect or interfere with the subject matter of the appeal, and thus impinge upon the appellate court's power and authority to decide the issues presented to it by the appeal, then the trial court can act. The jurisdiction of the appellate court is exclusive only as to the subject matter of the appeal.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“we do not agree that the test to determine loss of jurisdiction ... [is] whether the trial court is proceeding in a matter related to the final judgment ... [but rather] the proper test is whether the trial court is proceeding in a matter which affects the subject matter on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“predicated upon being the successful party in the litigation and [was] thus not dependent on the ultimate outcome of the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.