Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 So. 2d 980 - State v. Beasley

392 So. 2d 980 - State v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lovasco · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Liepelt · 374 So. 2d 508 - Thomas v. State · 273 So. 2d 415 - State v. Boren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It requires no extended argument to establish that prosecutors do not deviate from `fundamental conceptions of justice' when they defer seeking indictments until they have probable cause to believe an accused is guilty; indeed it is unprofessional conduct for a prosecutor to recommend an indictment on less than probable cause. It should be equally obvious that prosecutors are under no duty to file charges as soon as probable cause exists but before they are satisfied they will be able to establish the suspect's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. To impose such a duty would have a deleterious effect both upon the rights of the accused and upon the ability of society to protect itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.