Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 SW2D 127 - Sharp v. State

Sharp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2001

7 state decisions

3019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington v. State · 159 Tex. Crim. 220 - Leinart v. State · 137 Tex. Crim. 211 - Aiken v. State · 115 Tex. Crim. 249 - Shannon v. State · Roper v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is conceded that where a sale is actually consummated it is better pleading to incorporate in the indictment the stock certificate itself."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.