Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

392 U.S. 304

Hunt v. Connecticut

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1968-06-10

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1977

6 state decisions

Relies on Bruton v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Vacated and remanded · 6–3 · Decided 1968-06-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Connecticut is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).
/392/us/304 · .json · Public domain