Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 U.S. 364 - Mancusi v.

Mancusi v.’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

1,536
cited by 1,536 later decisions
58
cited 58 times by the Supreme Court
44
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

514 federal appellate · 55 district · 555 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,536 later decisions (58 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973), Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971)

514 federal appellate · 55 district · 555 state decisions — followed in 44 states

62801968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Simmons v. United States · Jones v. United States

Cited together with Katz v. United States · Jones v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Alderman v. United States · Terry v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,536 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable expectation of freedom from governmental intrusion.”
    39 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was not fundamentally changed because DeForte shared an office with other union officers”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““In order to qualify as a ‘person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure’ one must have been a victim of a search or seizure, one against whom the search was directed, as distinguished from one who claims prejudice only through the use of evidence gathered as a consequence of a search or seizure directed- at someone else”. 363 U.S. at 261, 80 S.Ct. at 731 .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.