Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 392 U.S. 631 - Sam Destefano v. Woods, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois. Frank Anthony Carceran

Sam Destefano v. Woods, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois. Frank Anthony Carceran’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

751
cited by 751 later decisions
83
cited 83 times by the Supreme Court
31
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

281 federal appellate · 19 district · 262 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 751 later decisions (83 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Batson v. Kentucky (1986), Rose v. Lundy (1982)

281 federal appellate · 19 district · 262 state decisions — followed in 31 states

36301968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Stovall v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Douglas v. People of State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 751 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ll three factors favor only prospective application”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he values implemented by the right to jury trial would not measurably be served by requiring retrial of all persons convicted in the past by procedures not consistent with the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the right to jury trial generally tends to prevent arbitrariness and repression[,] ... `[w]e would not assert ... that every criminal trial — or any particular trial — held before a judge alone is unfair or that a defendant may never be as fairly treated by a judge as he would be by a jury.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.