Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

393 F.2d 22

Docket No. 24876.

Gill v. Miller

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-03-18

2 counsel of record

Relies on Stewart v. Ramsay · Lamb v. Schmitt · Frank Munsey v. Wesley Webb T

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-03-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1980

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

70196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

G. Morton Good, Cromwell A. Anderson, Smathers & Thompson, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

Martin Greenbaum, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, and HOOPER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Concluding, as we do, that the trial court had a broad discretion in determining whether to grant or withhold immunity to a non-resident from being served with process while a subpoenaed witness at a hearing in the Southern District of Florida, Lamb v. Schmitt, 285 U.S. 222, 52 S.Ct. 317, 76 L.Ed. 720 (1932); Page Co. v. MacDonald, 261 U.S. 446, 43 S.Ct. 416, 67 L.Ed. 737; Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U.S. 128, 34 S.Ct. 44, 61 L.Ed. 192, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

/393/f2d/22 · .json · Public domain