United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
393 F.2d 318 · 1968
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2011
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · Schilling v. Rogers · Anderson v. United States · Kirkham v. Kirkham · United States v. Leventhal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no serviceman may assign his pay in advance of the date it becomes due and payable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dorfman v. Moorhous
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.