Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

393 F.2d 785

Docket No. 21904.

Caranza Steen v. Walter E. Craven

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-03-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1968

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-03-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Caranza Steen, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., John Fourt, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Walter E. Craven, Warden, is substituted for Robert A. Heinze, Warden, as appellee herein.

¶2

A notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of the entry of judgment, as required by Rule 73(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This court is accordingly without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal which is, therefore,

¶3

Dismissed.

/393/f2d/785 · .json · Public domain