Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 F.2d 90 - United States v. Bryan

United States v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis

393 F.2d 90 · 1968

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably United States v. Robin (1977), United States v. Partin (1977)

31 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

1801968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Will v. United States · Rapp v. Van Dusen · United States v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We believe that at least in a multijudge district such as the Southern District óf New York where the necessity of retrial before the same judge is not present, the practice of retrial before a different judge is salutary and in the public interest, especially as it minimizes even a suspicion of partiality. Because we believe that this outweighs any considerations of judicial economy and convenience, we hold that it is the wiser practice, wherever possible, that a lengthy criminal case be retried before a different judge unless all parties request that the same judge retry the case.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Wolfson v. Palmieri · United States v. Partin
  2. “will act pursuant to our views regarding the preferred practice in these matters, * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Wolfson v. Palmieri

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.