Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 F.3d 1024 - Docken v. Chase

Docken v. Chase’s Empirical Analysis

393 F.3d 1024 · 2004

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
January 2024
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Woodall v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (2005), Benchoff v. Colleran (2005)

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

160200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Heck v. Humphrey · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when a state prisoner is challenging the very fact or duration of his physical imprisonment, and the relief he seeks is a determination that he is entitled to immediate release or a speedier release from that imprisonment, his sole federal remedy is a writ of habeas corpus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`the extent to which § 1983 is a permissible alternative to the traditional remedy of habeas corpus.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has already been invalidated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.