United States v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
393 F.3d 107 · 2004
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Payne (2010), United States v. Snow (2006)
28 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · United States v. Morrison · United States v. Soto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[testimonial statements of witnesses absent from trial [are admissible] only where the declarant is unavailable, and only where the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine.” 541 U.S. at 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 . Though the Court declined to provide categorical guidance about what constituted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“interrogations by law enforcement officers,” Crawford, 541 U.S. at 53 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , and plea allocutions, see United States v. McClain, 377 F.3d 219, 220 (2d Cir.2004),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.