Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

393 F. App'x 108

Morel v. O'Brien

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-08-30

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2011

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-08-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Hector Morel, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morel v. O’Brien, No. 7:09-cv-00346-jlk-mfu, 2010 WL 1212573 (W.D.Va., Mar. 25, 2010). We deny Morel’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

/393/fappx/108 · .json · Public domain