Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

393 F. App'x 124

Breen v. Guttman

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 31, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-08-31

Decided 2010-08-31

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3John S. Breen and Teresa J. Breen appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Breen v. Guttman, Nos. 1:09-cv-02315-RDB; BK-02-58017-RAG (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2009; filed Nov. 3, 2009, entered Nov. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/393/fappx/124 · .json · Public domain