Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

393 F. App'x 90

Akinro v. Ramada Ltd.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 27, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-08-27

Decided 2010-08-27

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Ramada Ltd., No. 1:10-cv-01394-WMN, 2010 WL 2302335 (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/393/fappx/90 · .json · Public domain