393 F. Supp. 2d 508 - O'DONNELL v. Abbott’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 654A (§ 454a of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 654B (§ 454b of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Christensen v. Harris County · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. · Blessing v. Freestone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“receipt of payments from [noncustodial] parents . . . and for disbursements to custodial parents and other obligees. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. O'Donnell v. Abbott“forward child support payments as authorized by [federal] law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. O'Donnell v. Abbott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.