Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 Md. 196 - Bryant v. State

Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Taylor v. Fishkind (2012), W.R. Grace & Co. v. Swedo (2014)

45 state decisions

380200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Jones v. Howard · Bottoson v. Florida · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · Ruiz v. Estelle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Expert testimony may be admitted, in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if the court determines that the testimony will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue. In making that determination, the court shall determine (1) whether the witness is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, (2) the appropriateness of the expert testimony on the particular subject, and (3) whether a sufficient factual basis exists to support the expert testimony.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “action in admitting or excluding such testimony will seldom constitute a ground for reversal.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]n exercising the wide discretion vested in the trial courts concerning the admissibility of expert testimony, a critical test is whether the expert's opinion will aid the trier of fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.