Wang v. Wang’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2001
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 513 F. Supp. 1100 - Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. · Lytle v. Morgan · Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc. · State Ex Rel. Parker v. Youngquist · Ryken v. Blumer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]very action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Standing is established through being a `real party in interest' and it is statutorily controlled.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“We grant that there is some authority that, in an action between the original parties to the note, the intention to bind the principal instead of the agent may be relevant. In this case, however, the action is brought by a subsequent holder, not by an original party. We, therefore do not reach that specific issue at this time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. McNeill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.