Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 P2D 541 - Emerson v. State

Emerson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nelson v. State · 2 Okla. Crim. 589 - Reed v. State · 16 Okla. Crim. 602 - Burton v. State · Blanton v. State · 48 Okla. Crim. 418 - Musgraves v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where there is competent evidence in the record from which the jury could reasonably conclude that defendant was guilty as charged, the Court of Criminal Appeals will not interfere with the verdict even though there is a sharp conflict in the evidence and different inferences may be drawn therefrom, since it is the exclusive province of the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the facts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.