393 S.C. 159
711 S.E.2d 898
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 14, 2011
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2011-06-14
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2013
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2011-06-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 ORDER
¶2 Respondent was suspended on August 9, 2010, for a period of six months. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.
¶3 The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.