Adams v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2013
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 339 So. 2d 897 - Fontenot v. Fontenot · Succession of Bonnette · Fontenot v. Fontenot · 130 So. 2d 770 - Honeycutt v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co. · 276 So. 2d 347 - Taylor v. Bocock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find that this claim has not been sufficiently proven. First, there is no evidence as to what particular property was sold nor as to what Mrs. Adams did with the funds. She could have used the funds for the benefit of her separate estate, in which case no reimbursement would be due.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.