Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 2002 · most notably 513 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fundora (1987), United States v. Campbell (1985)
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 39 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Jordan v. De George · Ryan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it will ... be incumbent upon ... [defendant] to establish that he was not advised by his counsel and was otherwise unaware of the consequence of his deportation; that had he known of this consequence, he would not have entered the plea of guilty; and that such a consequence will actually flow from the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Ng Fung Ho v. White, 259 U.S. 276 , 42 S.Ct. 492 , 66 L.Ed. 938 (1922).... While we may not impose upon the trial court the obligation to advise the accused of this consequence ... its”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Jordan v. DeGeorge, 341 U.S. 223 , 71 S.Ct. 703 , 95 L.Ed. 886 (1951) (Jackson, J., dissenting); an event that results in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.