¶1Murvin asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to classify her as a youthful offender as provided in Section 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). The offense, however, took place prior to the effective date of the statute. Since the statute cannot be retroactively applied, the trial court’s imposition of sentence is AFFIRMED. Bradley v. State, 385 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Allen v. State, 383 So.2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); State v. Pizarro, rev’d on reh., 383 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
393 So. 2d 657
Murvin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 11, 1981
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1981-02-11
Relies on State v. Pizarro · Bradley v. State · 383 So. 2d 674 - Allen v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1981-02-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably 411 So. 2d 919 - Flesche v. Interstate Warehouse (1982), SQUARE G. CONST. CO. v. Grace (1982)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →