393 So. 2d 718 - State v. McPhate’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1992
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · State v. Robinson · 363 So. 2d 1364 - State v. Hammontree · 375 So. 2d 364 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While we have recognized that prisoners are not totally bereft of Fourth Amendment rights by virtue of their incarceration, we have also declared these rights are diminished in nature and scope because of confinement for criminal conduct. We have expressly recognized and declared that an inmate’s expectations of privacy are considerably less than those of the free members of our society in general. State v. Dauzat, 364 So.2d 1000 (La.1978); See also Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 , 99 S.Ct. 1861 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979), which upheld warrantless room searches and visual body cavity searches of inmates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Guirlando
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.