Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 So. 2d 822 - Moore v. Moore

393 So. 2d 822 - Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1988
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 348 So. 2d 75 - Pearce v. Pearce · Rittiner v. Sinclair · 150 So. 2d 772 - Sachse v. Sachse · 216 So. 2d 391 - Smith v. Smith · 362 So. 2d 1164 - Brannon v. Brannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have held that, under this statute respecting an award of alimony to a wife without “fault,” the word “fault” contemplates conduct or substantial acts of commission or omission by the wife viola-tive of her marital duties and responsibilities. A wife is not deprived of alimony after divorce simply because she was not totally blameless in the marital discord. Vicknair v. Vicknair, 237 La. 1032 , 112 So.2d 702 (1959); Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La. 776 , 66 So.2d 804 (1953); Breffeilh v. Breffeilh, 221 La. 843 , 60 So.2d 457 (1952); Adler v. Adler, 239 So.2d 494 (La.App. 4th Cir.1970). To constitute fault, a wife’s misconduct must not only be of a serious nature but must also be an independent contributory or proximate cause of the separation. Kendrick v. Kendrick, 236 La. 34 , 106 So.2d 707 (1958). [ 348 So.2d at 77 ] (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"[A] When a spouse has not been at fault and has not sufficient means for support, the court may allow that spouse, out of the property and earnings of the other spouse, permanent periodic alimony which shall not exceed one-third of his or her income...."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “must be serious and an independent contributory or proximate cause of the separation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.