Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 SW3D 15 - Commonwealth v. Ousley

Commonwealth v. Ousley’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Ross · Oliver v. United States · Hester v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Girl Scouts, pollsters, mail carriers, door-to-door salesmen just do not knock on one's door at midnight; and if they do, they are more likely to be met by an enraged (and possibly armed) resident than one with a welcoming smile.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “just as the police may invade the curtilage without a warrant only to the extent that the public may do so, they may also invade the curtilage only when the public may do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[albsent an emergency, such as the need to use a phone to dial 911, no reasonable person would expect the public at his door at [that] time{ ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.