Sherer v. Sherer’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. · Travelers Insurance Co. v. Joachim · Heldenfels Bros. v. City of Corpus Christi · Mafrige v. Ross · Meadows v. Bierschwale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would require a judicial determination of disputed facts”). 6 . Nor did the body of either question direct the jury to determine the Feldmans’ damages resulting from an arbitrary or capricious denial of their plans, or from a negligent misrepresentation on which they relied. Rather, each question asked the jury to determine the Feldmans’ damages that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A constructive trust is a remedy——not a cause of action. . . . An underlying cause of action such as a breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, or unjust enrichment is required. The constructive trust is merely the remedy used to grant relief on the underlying cause of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A constructive trust is a remedy-not a cause of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.