Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 S.W.3d 621 - State v. Peal

State v. Peal’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Forrest · State v. Mayes · State v. Freeman · State v. Oates · State v. Winfrey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “abuse of discretion occurs when a trial court’s ruling is clearly against the logic of the circumstances and is so unreasonable as to indicate a lack of careful consideration.” State v. Peal, 393 S.W.3d 621, 625 (Mo.App.W.D.2013) (internal citations and quotations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.