Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 U.S. 374 - Smith v. Hooey

Smith v. Hooey’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

2,342
cited by 2,342 later decisions
51
cited 51 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

581 federal appellate · 104 district · 1,195 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,342 later decisions (51 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably Barker v. Wingo (1972), United States v. Marion (1971)

581 federal appellate · 104 district · 1,195 state decisions — followed in 48 states

1.2k01969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Barber v. Page · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Ewell

Cited together with Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Dickey v. Florida · United States v. Marion · United States v. Ewell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,342 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “undue and oppressive incarceration prior to trial.”
    59 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “constitutional duty to make a diligent, good-faith effort”
    31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed[.]”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.