Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 393 U.S. 5 - Arsenault v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Arsenault v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

401
cited by 401 later decisions
31
cited 31 times by the Supreme Court
28
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

123 federal appellate · 16 district · 157 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 401 later decisions (31 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2020 · most notably Brady v. United States (1970), McMann v. Richardson (1970)

123 federal appellate · 16 district · 157 state decisions — followed in 28 states

22601968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Stovall v. Denno · Douglas v. People of State of California · Hamilton v. Alabama · White v. State of Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 401 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The right to counsel at the trial (Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799) on appeal (Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811) and at the other 'critical' stages of the criminal proceedings (Hamilton v. Alabama, [ 368 U.S. 52 , 82 S.Ct. 157, 7 L.Ed.2d 114]) have all been made retroactive, since the 'denial of the right must almost invariably deny a fair trial.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When one pleads to a capital charge without benefit of counsel, we do not stop to determine whether prejudice resulted [citations omitted]. In this case ... the degree of prejudice can never be known. Only the presence of counsel could have enabled this accused to know all the defenses available to him and to plead intelligently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.