Fuller v. Alaska’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
97 federal appellate · 12 district · 111 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 299 later decisions (37 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2014 · most notably Teague v. Lane (1989), Stone v. Powell (1976)
97 federal appellate · 12 district · 111 state decisions — followed in 18 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Stovall v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Linkletter v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 299 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Lee ruled that evidence obtained in violation of § 605 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 was not admissible in state criminal proceedings. Unfortunately, the meaning of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Judd v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.